As I knew

- A vs B ( Avg Skill on field : A > B )
1. A won B : not increase morale for both.
2. B won/drew A : +morale for B, -morale for A
3. Red card for A, and the result was A won/drew B ---> +morale for A, -morale for B
4. One red card for A and for B, too : +morale for B, -morale for A.
5. Two red cards for A and one for B : like No.3
...

Look very resonable but :

Example :
About no.1: A won B: 1-0 /2-1/3-1, still not increase for A. OK! Fine. But when A won B : 5-0/6-0...and average skill's A = 110, B=109 ( A>B, not uequal). Still not +morale for A. Fair?

About no.2 : OK, Avg skill( Avg S) of the players on the field : A > B but If Avg S' A =110, and AS' B=109, it'll not unequal. (When A = 110, B= 80, yes, it's unequal.). Then A still be - morale. Fair ?

Both cases of above, I want to say that average skill of the players on the field of A&B are the same ( 110-109) but When A won, not +morale, and B won/drew, +morale for B & -morale for A. FAIR???


About no.3/4/5 ...red card:

Ex : A(90), B(120)
A vs B, red card for B, B won/drew, +morale for B, -morale for A. Reasonable???

Ex: A (100), B(100)
A vs B, the score was 1-1 at 89'.
At 90', red card for B, and after that the result still was 1-1.
+ morale for B, -morale for A. Reasonable???

Ex: A(100), B(120)
A vs B, the score was 1-1 at 85'. If nothing happened, at the end, A would +morale, and -morale for B ( b'coz average A<B )
But at 89', red card for B, and after that the result still was 1-1.
So b'coz red card for B and B drew this match, irrespective of average A<B, B would +morale, and -morale for A. Reasonable ???

Ex: A(100), B(120)
A vs B, the score was 0-2 at 89'.
At 90', red card for B, and after that the result still was 0-2. -morale for A, +morale for B. ???

If Red card for B at the first half, there was not any complain. b'coz A would have the second half to play to score a goal.



+morale or -morale doesn't matter with me, it's plus or minus my players power about 1, 2 points.
The matter here was that when my players have -morale, they would play very bad, so bad, extremly bad even if the power of them was 125... That is the question !!!

So plz check them out and take measures to correct the fault to make the game more fair & reasonable.
Thank you.
P/S :sorry for my English.

Lets just play a game, shall we?

If we start making adjustment for everyone that plays this game, it won't be a game left on the site but a scientific prediction machine.

Games are randomized for a reason - to make it more interesting.

And what about special ability leader?

What about it?

It is a question to the author.

We spend money for what ?

Sth likes this , huh ?

http://www.11x11.com/reports/12016257

That's irresponsible

Irresponsible is to change everything to make it more like a science rather than a game.



You tell me what you spend your money for Definitely not to change a game engine.
Think about it - if you always win, somebody always looses. Is that fair? Thats why there is an element of surprise in some matches.

What the hell are you saying ?

Did I force you to change this game for my Win ?
I just said that please to check about the way you mark morale after the match.

It's not reasonable ! like some examples I posted above.
Do you understand ?

If you cannot understand, try dictionary.



Never said that(again, dictionary)



I am sure game developers did just that before they allowed anyone to play this game.



Do you?

OK !
If you said that, i wouldn't say anymore.
I don't need dictionary.Did you play me down, guy?
I understood what you said but the things what you said are not satisfy my questions.

Do you play this game? Can you answer me what are the things interested in this game ?

Not interested to play this game?

http://www.11x11.com/xml/main/rules.php?id=3

Section 8 is for you!
Although I think section 4.4.1 applies to you, sir!